Article
Open Access
Autonomous and sustainable machine learning: pursuing new horizons of intelligent systems
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
  • Volume
  • Citation
    Pedrycz W. Autonomous and sustainable machine learning: pursuing new horizons of intelligent systems. Artif. Intell. Auton. Syst. 2024(1):0002, https://doi.org/10.55092/aias20230002. 
  • DOI
    10.55092/aias20230002
  • Copyright
    Copyright2023 by the authors. Published by ELSP.
Abstract

The paradigm of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning has resulted in an amazingly diverse plethora of models operating in various environments and quite often exhibiting numerous successes. There is a growing spectrum of challenging application areas of high criticality where one has to meet a number of fundamental requirements. Those manifest evidently when Machine Learning constructs have to function autonomously and any decisions being rendered entail far reaching implications. The carefully crafted learning process has to result with advanced models. Along with the developed models, they have to come hand-in-hand with credibility measures that are crucial to assess an extent to which the results generated by such measures are meaningful, trustworthy and credible.

The credibility of the Machine Learning models becomes of paramount importance given the nature of application domains. Autonomous systems including autonomous vehicles, user identification (both using audio and video channels), financial systems (calling for sound mechanisms to quantify risk levels) require the ML system making classification or prediction decisions some level of self-awareness. Among others, this translates to forming sound answers to the following crucial questions emerging within the design process:

How much confidence could be associated with the result?

Could any action /decision be taken on a basis of obtained result?

Given the reported level of credibility, is there any other experimental evidence one could acquire to validate the decision?

In this study, we advocate that a general way to achieve such goals is to engage the mechanism of Granular Computing; subsequently, the granularity endowing the results are sought as a vehicle use to quantify the credibility level. Sustainable (or green) Machine Learning gives rise to the agenda of knowledge reuse, namely exploring possibilities of potential reuse of the already designed models in a spectrum of current environments where computing overhead as one of the ways to contribute to the agenda of sustainable Machine Learning and discuss a crucial role of information granularity in this context.

Keywords

Sustainable machine learning; granular computing; awareness; knowledge transfer; credibility

Preview
References
  • [1]Arrieta AB, Díaz-Rodríguez N, Del Ser J, Bennetot A, Tabik S, et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Inf Fusion 2020(58): 82-115.
  • [2]Castanyer RC, Martínez-Fernández S, Franch X. Which design decisions in AI-enabled mobile applications contribute to Greener AI? arXiv 2021, 2109:15284.
  • [3]Pedrycz W. Towards green machine learning: challenges, opportunities, and developments. J Smart Environ Green Comput 2022, 2: 163-74.
  • [4]Schwartz R, Dodge J, Smith NA, Etzioni O, Green AI. arXiv:1907.10597v3, 2019.
  • [5]Tornede T, Tornede A, Hanselle J, Wever M, Mohr F, Hullermeier E. Green Automated Machine Learning: Status Quo and Future Directions. arXiv: 2022, 2111: 058550.
  • [6]Alefeld G, Herzberger J. Introduction to Interval Computations. New York: Academic Press, USA, 1983.
  • [7]Wang Y. On intelligent mathematics (IM): What's missing in general AI and Cognitive Computing? 4th International Conference on Physics, Mathematics and Statistics (ICPMS’21) 2021, 1.
  • [8]Wang Y. On abstract intelligence and brain informatics: mapping cognitive functions of the brain onto its neural structures. Int. J. Cogn. Inform. 2012, 6(4): 54-80.
  • [9]Wang Y. On cognitive informatics, Brain and Mind: A Transdisciplinary. J. Neurosci. 2003, 4(2): 151-167.
  • [10]Zadeh LA, Towards a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1997, 90: 111-117.
  • [11]Pedrycz W. Granular Computing. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Fl 2013.
  • [12]Pedrycz W. Granular computing for data analytics: a manifesto of human-centric computing. IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2018, 5:1025-1034.
  • [13]Moore R. Interval Analysis. Hoboken: Prentice Hall, USA, 1966.
  • [14]Moore R, Kearfott RB, Cloud MJ. Introduction to Interval Analysis. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2009.
  • [15]Nguyen H, Walker E. A First Course in Fuzzy Logic. Chapman Hall: CRC Press, 1999.
  • [16]Pedrycz W. An Introduction to Computing with Fuzzy Sets——Analysis, Design, and Applications. Berlin: Springer, 2020.
  • [17]Pedrycz W. Shadowed sets, representing and processing fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1998, 28: 103-109.
  • [18]Pawlak Z. Rough sets. Int J Info Technol Comp Sci 1982, 15(11): 341-356.
  • [19]Pawlak Z. Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1991.
  • [20]Mendel JM, John RI, Liu F. Interval Type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2006, 14:808-82.