Article
Open Access
Developing a Machine Intelligence Quotient (MIQ) for evaluating autonomous vehicle intelligence: A conceptual framework
1 Autonomous and Intelligent Systems Laboratory, School of Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Simon Fraser University, Surrey, BC V3T 0A3, Canada
2 DyMo Technology Corp, Vancouver Canada
  • Volume
  • Citation
    Cina M, Rad A, Rasuli AR. Developing a Machine Intelligence Quotient (MIQ) for evaluating autonomous vehicle intelligence: A conceptual framework. Artif. Intell. Auton. Syst. 2024(2):0007, https://doi.org/10.55092/aias20240007. 
  • DOI
  • Copyright
    Copyright2024 by the authors. Published by ELSP.
  • Special Issue
Abstract

This paper presents a methodology to quantify the Machine Intelligence Quotient (MIQ) for autonomous cars. MIQ integrates multi-dimensional categories—Physical, Cognitive, and Functionality Intelligence attributes—to evaluate vehicle intelligence in a comprehensive manner. By focusing on the harmony of these facets with human cognitive and decision-making processes, MIQ provides a transformative approach to understanding and enhancing autonomous vehicle technology. This framework not only offers an empirical method for intelligence assessment but also sets a visionary benchmark, advocating for advancements that parallel human-like intelligence in future autonomous systems.

Keywords

autonomous vehicle intelligence; Machine Intelligence Quotient (MIQ); cognitive computing in vehicles; Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS); intelligent vehicle systems; human-centric vehicle technology

Preview
References
  • [1] Turing AM. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 1950, 59(236):433–460.
  • [2] French RM. Subcognition and the limits of the turingtest. Mind 1990, 99(393):53–65.
  • [3] Nascimento AM, Vismari LF, Molina CBST, Cugnasca PS, Camargo JB, et al. A systematic literature review about the impact of artificial intelligence on autonomous vehicle safety. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2019, 21(12):4928–4946.
  • [4] Xuan D, Rongye S. A survey on autonomous vehicle control in the era of mixed-autonomy: From physics-based to AI-guided driving policy learning. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2021, 125:103008.
  • [5] Moor JH. The status and future of the turing test. Mines Mach. 2001, 11(1):77–93.
  • [6] Chollet F. Deep learning with python, 2nd ed. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2021, pp. 504.
  • [7] Minsky M. The society of mind, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1988, pp. 336.
  • [8] Zadeh LA. Fuzzy logic, neural networks, and soft computing. In Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy systems: Selected papers by Lotfi A Zadeh. Binghamton: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd, 1996, pp. 775–782.
  • [9] Zadeh LA. The role of fuzzy logic in modeling, identification and control. In Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy systems: Selected papers by Lotfi A Zadeh. Binghamton: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd, 1996, pp. 783–795.
  • [10] Bien Z, Bang WC, Kim DY, Han JS. Machine intelligence quotient: Its measurements and applications. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2002, 127(1):3–16.
  • [11] Park HJ, Kim BK, Lim KY. Measuring the Machine Intelligence Quotient (MIQ) of human-machine cooperative systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Humans 2001, 31(2):89–96.
  • [12] Todd L. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions. Victoria: Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2017, pp: 22.
  • [13] Bringsjord S, Schimanski B. What is artificial intelligence? Psychometric AI as an answer. In Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico, 2003, pp. 887–893.
  • [14] Biswas A, Wang HC. Autonomous vehicles enabled by the integration of IOT, edge intelligence, 5g, and blockchain. Sensors 2023, 23(4):1963.
  • [15] Wang P. On defining artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 2019, 10(2):1–37.
  • [16] Akata Z, Perronnin F, Harchaoui Z, Schmid C. Label-embedding for image classification. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2015, 38(7):1425–1438.
  • [17] Amodei D, Olah C, Steinhardt J, Christiano P, Schulman J, et al. Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1606.06565.
  • [18] Blili-Hamelin B, Hancox-Li L, Smart A. Unsocial intelligence: A pluralistic, democratic, and participatory investigation of agi discourse. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2401.13142.
  • [19] Liu F, Shi Y, Liu Y. Intelligence quotient and intelligence grade of artificial intelligence. Ann. Data Sci. 2017, 4(2):179–191.
  • [20] Smith BC. The foundations of computing. In Computationalism: New directions. Cambridg: MIT Press, 2002, pp. 23–58.
  • [21] Haspiel J, Du N, Meyerson J, Jr. Lionel PR, Tilbury D, et al. Explanations and expectations: Trust building in automated vehicles. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Chicago, pp. 119–120.
  • [22] Hewitt C, Politis I, Amanatidis T, Sarkar A. Assessing public perception of self-driving cars: The autonomous vehicle acceptance model. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, California, USA, 17–20 March 2019 pp. 518–527.
  • [23] Atakishiyev S., Salameh M., Goebel R. Incorporating explanations into human-machine interfaces for trust and situation awareness in autonomous vehicles. In 2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, 2–5 June 2024, pp. 2948–2955.
  • [24] Chen CLP., Liu Z. Broad learning system: An effective and efficient incremental learning system without the need for deep architecture. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. 2018, 29(1):10–
  • [25] Guo J, Kurup U, Shah M. Is it safe to drive? An overview of factors, metrics, and datasets for driveability assessment in autonomous driving. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2019, 21(8):3135–3151.
  • [26] Goertzel B, Wang P. Adaptive algorithmic hybrids for human-level artificial intelligence. In Advances in artificial general intelligence: Concepts, architectures and algorithms. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2007, pp. 94.
  • [27] D Helbing. Social self-organization: Agent-based simulations and experiments to study emergent social behavior, 1st ed. Berlin: Springer, 2012.
  • [28] K Warwick. Artificial intelligence: The basics, 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2012.
  • [29] Harari YN Homo Deus. A brief history of tomorrow, 1st ed. London: Harvill Secker, 2016.
  • [30] Maturana HR Varela FJ. Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living, 1st ed. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, 1991.
  • [31] Lefebvre VA. The fundamental structures of human reflexion. J. Soc. Biol. Struct. 1987, 10(2):129–175.
  • [32] Omeiza D, Webb H, Jirotka M, Kunze L. Explanations in autonomous driving: A survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 23(8):10142–10162.
  • [33] Atakishiyev S, Salameh M, Yao H, Goebel R. Explainable artificial intelligence for autonomous driving: A comprehensive overview and field guide for future research directions. IEEE Access 2024, 12:101603–101625.
  • [34] Arrieta AB, Díaz-Rodríguez N, Ser JD, Bennetot A, Tabik S, et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Inf. Fusion 2020, 58:82–115.
  • [35] Russell S, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence: A modern approach, 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2010.
  • [36] Johansson R. Vision zero—implementing a policy for traffic safety. Saf. Sci. 2009, 47(6):826–831.
  • [37] Searle JR. Minds, brains, and programs. Behav. Brain Sci. 1980, 3(3):417–424.
  • [38] Dennett DC. Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1991.
  • [39] Pfeifer R, Bongard J. How the body shapes the way we think: A new view of intelligence, 1st ed. Cambridge: MIT press, 2006.
  • [40] Wallach W, Allen C. Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.