Article
Open Access
An automated crane operation and construction material supply strategy
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Abstract

Traditional construction methods pose unique challenges, such as lack of skilled workers, long construction time and difficulties in quality control. To solve the limitations of traditional construction methods, modular construction has been widely investigated and applied. With the development of robotic technologies and control algorithms, robotic construction, which can further enhance the advantages of modular construction, has attracted many researchers’ attention. In this study, an automated crane operation framework, which considers the robotic kinematics analysis and a loop shaping control algorithm, is proposed to automate the construction process. The proposed automated crane operation framework was verified through a construction material supply experiment. To test the performance of the loop shaping controller, a constant reference signal and a sine wave signal are used. The constant reference signal is used to assess whether the loop shaping controller can accurately control the crane to transport the construction material to the pre-defined target position. The reference sine signal is used to test the ability of continuous tracking of the loop shaping controller. Through construction supply experiments, the proposed automated crane operation framework can automate the mobile crane operation in a construction material supply task. This research indicates the potential of robotizing traditional mobile cranes by implementing robotic technologies and control algorithms for automated construction projects.

Keywords

automated crane operation; automated construction; robotic crane; robotic kinematics; loop shaping control

Preview
References
  • [1]Jaillon L, Poon C S. The evolution of prefabricated residential building systems in Hong Kong: A review of the public and the private sector. Autom. Constr. 2009, 18(3):239-248.
  • [2]Jaillon L, Poon C S. Life cycle design and prefabrication in buildings: A review and case studies in Hong Kong. Autom. Constr. 2014, 39:195-202.
  • [3]Xu G, Zhong RY, Yang H, Huang GQ. Cloud asset-enabled prefabrication transportation service for public housing production in Hong Kong. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Gothenburg, Sweden, August 24-28, 2015, pp. 1497-1502.
  • [4]Li Z, Shen GQ, Xue X. Critical review of the research on the management of prefabricated construction. Habitat Int. 2014, 43:240-249.
  • [5]Rahim AA, Qureshi SL. A review of IBS implementation in Malaysia and Singapore. Planning Malaysia 2018:16.
  • [6]Lu W, Chen K, Xue F, Pan W. Searching for an optimal level of prefabrication in construction: An analytical framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 201:236-245.
  • [7]Rampersad H K. State of the art in robotic assembly. Industrial Robot 1995, 22(2):10-13.
  • [8]Chen H, Xu J, Zhang B, Fuhlbrigge T. Improved parameter optimization method for complex assembly process in robotic manufacturing. Industrial Robot 2017, 44(1):21-27.
  • [9]Ji S, Lee S, Yoo S, Suh I, Kwon I, et al. Learning-based automation of robotic assembly for smart manufacturing. Proc. IEEE 2021, 109(4):423-440.
  • [10]Xiao Y, Pan X, Yang TY. Nonlinear backstepping hierarchical control of shake table using high–gain observer. Earthq Eng Struct D. 2022, 51(14):3347-3366.
  • [11]Chen Z, Yang TY, Xiao Y, Pan X, Yang W. Vision-aided nonlinear control framework for shake table tests. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2309.00187.
  • [12]Xiao Y, Pan X, Tavasoli S, Azimi M, Bao Y, et al. Autonomous inspection and construction of civil infrastructure using robots. In Automation in Construction toward Resilience, 1st ed. Florida: CRC Press, 2024. pp. 1-26.
  • [13]Xiao Y, Yang TY, Pan X, Xie F, Chen Z. A reinforcement learning based construction material supply strategy using robotic crane and computer vision for building reconstruction after an earthquake. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2308.16280.
  • [14]Wang H, Pan Y, Li S, Yu H. Robust sliding mode control for robots driven by compliant actuators. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2018, 27(3):1259-1266.
  • [15]Melenbrink N, Werfel J, Menges A. On-site autonomous construction robots: Towards unsupervised building. Autom. Constr. 2020, 119: 103312.
  • [16]Pan M, Linner T, Pan W, Cheng HM, Bock T. Influencing factors of the future utilisation of construction robots for buildings: A Hong Kong perspective. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 30:101220.
  • [17]Leong Z, Chen R, Xu Z, Lin Y, Hu N. Robotic arm three-dimensional printing and modular construction of a meter-scale lattice façade structure. Eng. Struct. 2023, 290:116368
  • [18]Geno J, Goosse J, Van Nimwegen S, Latteur P. Parametric design and robotic fabrication of whole timber reciprocal structures. Autom. Constr. 2022, 138:104198.
  • [19]Willmann J, Knauss M, Bonwetsch T, Apolinarska AA, Gramazio F, et al. Robotic timber construction—Expanding additive fabrication to new dimensions. Autom. Constr. 2016, 61:16-23.
  • [20]Rogeau N, Tiberghien V, Latteur P, Weinand Y. Robotic insertion of timber joints using visual detection of fiducial markers. In Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC), Kitakyushu, Japan, October 26-27, 2020, pp. 491-498.
  • [21]Singhose W. Command shaping for flexible systems: A review of the first 50 years. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2009, 10:153-168.
  • [22]Singhose W, Vaughan J. Reducing vibration by digital filtering and input shaping. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2010, 19(6):1410-1420.
  • [23]Ragunathan S, Frakes D, Peng K, Singhose W. Filtering effects on input-shaped command signals for effective crane control. In 2011 9th IEEE International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA), Santiago, Chile, December 19-21, 2011, pp. 1097-1101.
  • [24]Hu Y, Wu B, Vaughan J, Singhose W. Oscillation suppressing for an energy efficient bridge crane using input shaping. In 2013 9th Asian Control Conference (ASCC), Istanbul, Turkey, June 23-26, 2013, pp. 1-5.
  • [25]Fujioka D, Shah M, Singhose W. Robustness analysis of input-shaped model reference control on a double-pendulum crane. In 2015 American Control Conference (ACC), Chicago, Illinois, USA, July 1-3, 2015, pp. 2561-2566.
  • [26]Rehman SF, Mohamed Z, Husain AR, Ramli L, Abbasi MA, et al. Adaptive input shaper for payload swing control of a 5-DOF tower crane with parameter uncertainties and obstacle avoidance. Autom. Constr. 2023, 154:104963.
  • [27]Zhu N, Gao XT, Huang CQ. A data-driven approach for on-line auto-tuning of minimum variance PID controller. ISA transactions 2022, 130:325-342.
  • [28]Dogru O, Velswamy K, Ibrahim F, Wu Y, Sundaramoorthy AS, et al. Reinforcement learning approach to autonomous PID tuning. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 2022, 161:107760.
  • [29]Coutinho JPL, Santos LO, Reis MS. Bayesian Optimization for automatic tuning of digital multi-loop PID controllers. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 2023, 173:108211.
  • [30]Mourtas SD, Kasimis C, Katsikis VN. Robust PID controllers tuning based on the beetle antennae search algorithm. Memories-Mater., Devices, Circuits and Systems 2023, 4:100030.
  • [31]Li Y, Bi J, Han W, Tan W. Tuning of PID/PIDD2 controllers for integrating processes with robustness specification. ISA transactions 2023, 140:224-236.
  • [32]Kuo TYT, Kang SCJ. Control of fast crane operation. Autom. Constr. 2014, 42:25-35.
  • [33]Thomas M, Sawodny O. Flatness-based feedforward and modal model-predictive state-feedback control of a double pendulum bridge crane. IFAC-Pap. Online 2022, 55(27):19- 24.
  • [34]Kang SC, Miranda E. Planning and visualization for automated robotic crane erection processes in construction. Autom. Constr. 2006, 15(4):398-414.
  • [35]Kayhani N, Taghaddos H, Mousaei A, Behzadipour S, Hermann U. Heavy mobile crane lift path planning in congested modular industrial plants using a robotics approach. Autom. Constr. 2021, 122:103508.
  • [36]Zhu A, Zhang Z, Pan W. Crane-lift path planning for high-rise modular integrated construction through metaheuristic optimization and virtual prototyping. Autom. Constr. 2022, 141:104434.
  • [37]Tian J, Luo S, Wang X, Hu J, Yin J. Crane lifting optimization and construction monitoring in steel bridge construction project based on BIM and UAV. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021, 2021:1-15.
  • [38]Hauser K. Kris’ locomotion and manipulation planning toolbox - Klamp’t. 2021. Available: https://github.com/krishauser/Klamp (accessed on 15 January 2024).